A Look into Personalized Learning

Technology on a blackboard - CC0 Public Domain

Richard Culatta, formerly with the Office of Educational Technology, identified three major challenges that exist within our current educational system: we treat all learners the same, we keep a constant schedule despite varied learning, and we provide feedback too late for it be useful to learners. In his TEDx talk, “Reimagining Learning”, Culatta suggests that shifting to a personalized learning approach is essential for the future of education. This approach leverages the use of technology to “reimagine learning” not in a way that simply digitizes traditional media but rather a way that provokes learner engagement and allows for a more personalized learning environment tailored to each learner’s individual needs.

A problem arises when all learners are being taught exactly the same despite their unique needs, interests, and challenges. “In order to develop a learning environment, individual differences need to be taken into consideration to ensure the impact on students’ achievements and satisfactions.” (Samah, Noraffandy, & Ali, 2011).

Culatta cleverly equates the issue of teaching every learner exactly the same to that of a physician who prescribes the same medication for each individual patient despite his or her illness or condition. The prescription is not based on an individual’s needs but rather adopts a “one-size-fits-all” strategy. This prescriptive approach is very similar to the current approach to education, Culatta believes it’s crucial to make the shift to personalized learning.

Personalized learning is defined in the following way by the U.S. Department of Education (2010):

Personalization refers to instruction that is paced to learning needs (i.e., individualized), tailored to learning preferences (i.e., differentiated), and tailored to the specific interests of different learners. In an environment that is fully personalized, the learning objectives and content as well as the method and pace may all vary. (p. 12)

Sam Redding, executive director at Academic Development Institute, believes that

…a student’s desire to learn and effectiveness in learning are enhanced when the learning is personalized, meaning that the student is given greater choice in selecting topics, greater control over the learning environment and learning strategies, greater access to learning resources, and frequent feedback about learning progress. (Redding, 2014, p. 4)

Technology can be used to make the connection between a learner and their individual interests. Today’s learners have 24/7 access to information, they can use multimedia to play, create, and explore, and they can connect with people all around the world to collaborate, share ideas, and learn! Mary Ann Wolf, PhD describes the use of technology in personalized learning:

Personalized learning requires not only a shift in the design of schooling, but also a leveraging of modern technologies. Personalization cannot take place at scale without technology. Personalized learning is enabled by smart e-learning systems, which help dynamically track and manage the learning needs of all students, and provide a platform to access myriad engaging learning content, resources, and learning opportunities needed to meet each student’s needs everywhere at any time, but which are not all available within the four walls of the traditional classroom. (Wolf, 2010, p. 10)

Maker Education marries a personalized learning environment with the use of technology creating a legitimate approach to learning.

Within the Maker culture, the learner is encouraged to create, play, imagine, and explore possibilities and outcomes based on their individual needs, challenges, and interests through the use of technology and innovation. When learning becomes personal, the learner becomes invested in the experience. If a learner was tasked with the assignment to use only the Makey Makey invention kit and only red Play-Doh to act as controllers in order to play Super Mario on a laptop computer, would the learning experience be the same compared to someone that had the opportunity to choose a Maker invention kit, controller objects, device(s), and project outcome(s) based on their personal interests? Would the experience of using a Maker invention kit be the same without the use of technology? How does technology enhance the overall learning experience? Does greater learning occur in a more personalized environment when the learner has the choice of creating their unique experience ?

21st century learning provides a more malleable learner-centered environment that can be tailored to individual needs through the use of technology creating a more dynamic, engaging, and personal learning experience.

Resources:

Culatta, Richard. (2013, January). Reimagining Learning [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z0uAuonMXrg.

Redding, S. (2014) Personal Competencies in Personalized Learning. [PDF file]. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University (Center on Innovations in Learning). Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org/publications/Personalized_Learning.pdf.

Redding, S. (2013). Through the student’s eyes: A Perspective on Personalized Learning and Practice Guide for Teachers. [PDF file]. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University (Center on Innovations in Learning). Retrieved from http://www.centeril.org/publications/2013_09_through_the_eyes.pdf.

Samah, N. A., Yahaya, N., & Ali, M. B. (2011). Individual differences in online personalized learning environment. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(7), 516-521. Retrieved from http://ezproxy.msu.edu.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com.proxy2.cl.msu.edu/docview/1657313561?accountid=12598.

U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Transforming American education: Learning powered by technology. [PDF file]. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/sites/default/files/NETP-2010-final-report.pdf.

Wolf, M. (2010). Innovate to education: System [re]design for personalized learning. A report from the 2010 symposium. [PDF file]. Washington, DC: Software & Information Industry Association. Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/Documents/2010%20Symposium%20on%20Personalized%20Learning.pdf.

Altmann, G. (2014, December). [Blackboard Technology Board] [Photograph]. Retrieved from https://pixabay.com/en/blackboard-technology-board-school-573023/.

Advertisements

Are you a Maker?

Close up glowing light bulb: CC0 Public Domain.

The first week of #CEP811 introduced the maker culture. I have never heard of this before so I wasn’t really sure what to expect, but the title alone intrigued me from the start. After watching Dale Dougherty’s TED talk “We are Makers” (several times over and over again just because I enjoyed it so much), I understood what “making” meant and I do believe that we are all makers in ways we don’t even realize and in ways that we do realize.

The assignment this week was to create a remix based on an aspect of the maker culture that resonated with us or the remix could be based on the culture itself as a whole. I have heard of remixing before but have never done anything with it other than watching remixes that my nephew made years ago. He was doing it at age 14 and I’m doing it for the first time at age 49. Better late than never. The four part series “Everything is a Remix” by Kirby Ferguson was amazing! The series examined remixing, provided excellent examples, and very interesting factual commentary not to mention talented film making. I walked away from watching the series with a solid understanding of remixing. I actually watched the series multiple times as well.

Now that I had an understanding of the maker culture and remixing, it was time to get to work and blend the two together. The goal was to convey a message to the audience using various types of media that incorporated something about the maker culture using a remix technique…all under one minute in length (that was the most challenging part). I played around with WeVideo for a few hours and found that I was so concerned with watching the “used time” counter on the website, that I wasn’t focusing on the true meaning of the assignment. I was making the tool the primary focus, not the message and the technique. Thankfully, I was able to switch tools and use Camtasia, a video-editing tool, to create my video. Quickly, the maker culture message and remix technique became my primary focus.

I extracted what I learned from Dale Dougherty’s TED talk and incorporated that into the primary message of my video. I used a combination of Vimeo and YouTube videos, SoundCloud audio as background music, and a still photo from Pixabay to create my video.

Whether it’s using a variety of ingredients that you would never think to use together to create a tasty dinner entrée or tinkering with computer parts in a garage not knowing that it would be the birth of a personal computer industry, we are all makers. We are Makers and shapers and put-it-togetherers.

I hope you enjoy my video remix and my take on the maker culture.

Arendse, Connery. M. (2013, February 19). CMA – You’re Free (Freedom EP) [Audio file]. Retrieved from https://soundcloud.com/cma-music/cma-youre-free-cma-freedom-ep.

ComputerHilfe@Home & Webservices. (2015, November 1). Sketch 1038 [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/UMjPwlaMSLY.

Dougherty, D. (2011, January). We are makers [Video file]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/dale_dougherty_we_are_makers.

Hossain, I. (2016, February 24). [Close up glowing light bulb] [Photograph]. Retrieved from https://pixabay.com/en/close-up-glowing-light-bulb-bright-1224277.

Lord, R. (2008, October 10). 12 Robots in a box [Video file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/1927460.

New York Hall of Science. (2015, September 25). Mouse Trap at World Maker Faire [Video file]. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gcdA0zxTqc.

Peace, O. (2013, August 28). HTF Presents: The Heidelberg project [Video file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/73281585.

Zirv. (2012, October 20). Groningen Maker Faire 2012 – Like Jar [Video file]. Retrieved from https://vimeo.com/50488888.